Home team goals 3

Away team goals 2

Home team shots on target 6

Away team shots on target 7

Home team shots off target 4

Away team shots off target 3

Home team goalkeeper saves 5

Away team goalkeeper saves 3

Home team corner kicks 4

Away team corner kicks 5

Home team fouls 8

Away team fouls 10

Home team substitutions 3

Away team substitutions 2

Home team offsides 2

Away team offsides 2

In this thrilling Ligue 2 face-off between Guingamp and SM Caen, Guingamp edged out a 3-2 victory, reflecting their slightly more potent strike force. Scoring from 50% of their on-target attempts, Guingamp had a clinical edge in front of the goal. This is in contrast to Caen, who managed seven successful shots on goal but abbreviated their chances with only a 29% conversion rate.

Looking at offensive productivity, Guingamp had ten attempts, with six on goal, a striking accuracy of 60%. In contrast, SM Caen had ten attempts with seven on target marking a 70% accuracy. However, the decisive factor lies in the goalkeeper's performance.

The Guingamp's goalkeeper stood as a strong bulwark — making five crucial saves. On the other hand, the SM Caen's goalie only managed to make three saves from six shots on target, a telling statistic that majorly contributed to the final outcome of the match. The performance of the keepers played a significant role in this matchup, reflecting the decisive influence of high-quality goalkeeping on match outcomes.

Turning to set-pieces, Guingamp had four corners, but it was SM Caen who had the edge with five. Despite this, neither team managed to convert these chances into goals, suggesting a need for improvements in their set-piece tactics.

The bookings, or rather the lack thereof, suggest a well-disciplined match with no red or yellow cards shown by the referee. The foul count, which stood at ten for SM Caen indicating more aggression, did not translate into any bookings. This clean, proper play is reflected in the equal offsides for both teams, which stood at two each, suggesting well-structured defenses and disciplined forward lines.

Substitutions also were key tactical components in this match. Guingamp made full use of all their available changes while SM Caen made only two. Although there's no direct correlation, it's plausible that the fresh legs and tactical adjustments made by Guingamp gave them the edge on the scoreboard.

In conclusion, though SM Caen had more shots on target and more corner kicks, it was Guingamp’s clinical finishing and superior goalkeeping that made the difference in the match. This coupled with the tactical advantage of substitutions, Guingamp secured the win they would have aimed for. The match is a testament that high scoring accuracy and top-tier goalkeeping can create a winning combination, even when outperformed in other metrics.

Football today takes a brief interlude, presenting a perfect moment to hone your betting prowess. Our tipsters have crafted insightful betting tips for the upcoming games, coupled with a free bet to get you started. With the added advantage of copy bets, mimic the strategies of successful bettors to enhance your winning potential. Embrace the expertise of our tipsters and transform your next bet into a victory, eagerly awaiting the return of the beautiful game with optimism.

Explore our sportsbook today!